LAKE CREEK
FISH WATER RELEASE
REQUIREMENT STUDY
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
The
enclosed information and data is intended for the consideration of those
concerned with establishing fish water release in Lake Creek as provided by the
WPPSS Packwood Project FPC License.
Based
on the information presented, it is recommended that further studies be
undertaken to more definitely establish the quantity of fish water releases
required to obtain optimum protection of the fishery resources.
OWEN W. HURD, Managing Director
Washington Public Power
Supply System

March
13, 1967
Mr. Ross Williams
Forest Supervisor
Gifford-Pinchot National Forest
512 West 12th Street
Vancouver, Washington 98660
Dear Mr. Williams:
This
letter is a comment on the waterflow in Lake Creek below Packwood Lake. It
follows our recent telephone conversation with respect to a meeting of the
fishery people which I understand is to be scheduled for March 22 at 9:30 a.m.
in your building. These comments are made in behalf of the Washington Public
Power Supply System and are intended to provide a basis for discussion at the
March 22nd meeting.
All
of the parties who are involved with the Packwood project are concerned about
the maintenance of an appropriate quantity of water in Lake Creek to provide
habitat for trout and spawning area for trout or salmon in lower Lake Creek and
habitat for trout in the creek immediately below the project drop structure at
the lake outlet.
I
have had correspondence with Dr. L. E. Perry of the Bureau of Commercial Fisheries
who indicates "all conservation agencies agreed that about 3 cfs of water
would be needed for release at the drop structure to maintain a live stream
that would support game fish. The same group agreed that probably 18 cfs of
water is necessary in lower Lake Creek to allow unrestricted passage of salmon
and steelhead in rearing areas for young of both species.
The
recent studies of temperature and flow in Lake Creek near the lake and near the
mouth of the creek have fairly well established the amount of inflow between
the lake and the mouth of the creek and the temperature patterns which may be
expected.
The
inflow between the upper and lower gauges did not go below 10 cfs during the
months of December through July in 1964, 1965 and 1966, and did not go below 5
cfs at any time. The temperature data show that the inflow was somewhat cooler
during the summer months than the water flowing out of the lake and the maximum
temperature in the lower stream during the summer of 1966 was recorded as 57°
at approximately the same time as the water flowing out of the lake was 67°.
This indicates that the temperature in the lower creek is probably never going
to rise to a level which would cause any difficulties for trout or salmon under
conditions of reduced stream flow.
The
flow data show also a major change in the flow pattern of the creek which can
be expected eventually to make changes in the bottom composition. The maximum
flows during flood conditions which make most of the physical changes
in the streambed will be
reduced by at least 300 cfs and probably somewhat more because of storage in
the lake. This reduction in peak flows can be expected to permit some
accumulation of finer materials in the bed of the stream. Such accumulation can
only be beneficial to trout and salmon because the existing streambed is
composed predominantly of boulders which is a poor environment for trout or
salmon spawning or for the young of either species. Some accumulation of gravel
and small rubble will provide additional spawning area and additional area for
fish food insects.
The
Washington Public Power Supply System has estimated the costs of maintaining
flows of varying size below the drop structure and in the lower creek. Such computations are laborious because of
the licensing arrangements, but they have provided me with estimates of the
cost of three different conditions. The cost of maintaining a 5 cfs fish
release at the drop structure would be $11,234 annually. The revenue penalty to
Washington Public Power Supply System of maintaining a 3 cfs at the drop
structure and 18 cfs minimum in the lower creek would amount to $20,474
annually. The revenue penalty of maintaining 2 cfs minimum at the drop
structure, 10 cfs minimum in the lower creek August through December, and 15
cfs January through July, would amount to $4,219, annually. The estimated
accumulative revenue penalty over a 50-year period compounded at 5% annually
would be respectively $2,352,000, $4,275,000 and $833,239.
These
figures indicate that the value or revenue penalty of maintaining water for
fishery purposes is substantial, that the amount increases very rapidly as more
than a few cfs is required, especially during autumn months, the period of low
flow.
I
would, therefore, argue that there should be a reasonable justification for the
maintenance of these fishery flows based on an estimate of the actual effect of
varying flows on the life of fish in the stream.
In my
experience with salmon and trout streams, I have observed, once a suitable
temperature is assured, that the fish capacity depends more on area and volume
of water than on flow of water. I, therefore, suggest that it is desirable to
measure the change in area of upper Lake Creek with changes in fish water
release from 1 to 10 cfs and similar measurement of changes in area of typical
sections of lower Lake Creek with changes in flow from about 5 to 18 cfs.
My
impression of both ends of this stream is that there is very little reduction
in area and volume of water in the stream as the flow approaches the lower
limits which I have suggested. The pool structure is such that the water tends
to be retained and I would doubt that there is a measurable effect on the
populations of fish.
It
would be relatively easy to obtain some specific data on this matter by
observing the stream in late summer, 1967, when flows can probably be
controlled through the ranges specified. At that time, observation could also
be
made on whether barriers
develop at low flows in the lower stream which would prevent the migration of
trout and salmon during the period of such flows.
I
believe the foregoing outlines the general problems which should be discussed
in our meeting scheduled for March 22.
Sincerely
yours,
William
F. Royce
Associate
Dean
WFR:ac
cc: Owen Hurd, Washington Public Power Supply
System
L. E. Perry, Bureau of Commercial
Fisheries
PACKWOOD PROJECT
SUMMARY OF CALCULATIONS OF FISH RELEASE VALUE
FOR VARIOUS MIN. RELEASE OF INTAKE AND FLOWS AT MOUTH
OF LAKE CREEK
FISH
RELEASE AT INTAKE
CONDITION
1 5
cfs min. fishwater discharge at intake
CONDITION
2 3
cfs min. at intake and 18 cfs min. flow at mouth of Lake Creek
CONDITION
3 2
cfs min. at intake; 15 cfs flow at mouth, Jan - July and 10 cfs at mouth, Aug - Dec.
|
|
CRITICAL YEAR - 1936-37 Controlling 1/ |
||
|
CONDITION |
Annual
Value of
Water Released |
50 Year Present Worth Amount (5 pct.) of
Energy Equivalent |
50 Year compounded Amount (5 pct.) Value of Energy Equivalent |
|
1 |
$11,234.00 |
$205,088.00 |
$2,352,000.00 |
|
2 |
$20,424.00 |
$372,861.00 |
$4,275,000.00 |
|
3 |
$ 4,219.00 |
$ 77,022.00 |
$
883,000.00 |
1/ Plant
capability during critical year governs revenue received during all years of project operation.
CALCULATION OF EXCHANGE CAPACITY AND VALUE
OF FLOW WITH NO MIN. FISH RELEASE AT INTAKE DURING
1936-37
CRITICAL WATER YEAR
|
SEPT. |
43.5 |
720 |
123 |
3,852,360 |
|
OCT. |
31.0 |
744 |
123 |
2,836,872 |
|
NOV. |
21.5 |
720 |
123 |
1,904,040 |
|
DEC. |
49.4 |
744 |
123 |
4,520,692 |
|
JAN. |
32.9 |
744 |
123 |
3,010,744 |
|
FEB. |
31.2 |
678 |
123 |
2,601,892 |
|
MAR. |
40.1 |
744 |
123 |
3,669,631 |
|
APR.
1 15 |
57.6 |
360 |
122.5 |
2,540,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
24,936,391 |
|
|
|
|
Draft |
4,500,000 |
|
|
|
|
T = |
29,436,391 |
B = 0.965 T 0.01025 PH 0.01025 AH
= 28,406,117
1.025 x 2m8878 x 5.448 X 105 1.102510+1 5.448(A)
= 28,406,117
1,612,605 55-842 (A)
= 26,793,512
55-842 (A)
-2
A = (0.0025/9.0)B
x 10
B
B = 26,793,512 -
B = 26,793,512 / 1.0 55117 = 26,384,238
A = (0.0025/9) B = 7328 KW
Critical Period Revenue
Capacity $ 205,756
Exchange
Capacity 7328 x 12 x $.95 = 83,534
Energy 0.01(28878+7053)5448x$.00125 =
2,446
291,741
Summer Revenue
Capacity = 123,453
Energy 173x123
3312x0.975x0.95x1.25 mille = 81,598
TOTAL
REVENUE 496,792
CONDITION
1
Value
Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, the values of energy
(kilo-watt-hours) and capacity (kilowatts) which shall be used in the determination
of Exchange quantities shall be as follows:
Energy -
$0.0025 (2.5 mills) per kilowatt-hour
Capacity - $9.00
per kilowatt year
Formula
The following formula then shall govern:
A = ![]()
B = T 0.035 T-(0.01 PH + 0.025 x 0.01 PH)
- (0.01 AH +
0.025 x 0.01 AH)
The calculation of Energy and Exchange Capacity, which
shall be in effect from the effective date of this agreement until modified in
accordance with section 6 hereof, shall be as follows:
P = 28,878 kw
H = 5,448 Hrs. (Sept. 1 through Apr. 15)
PH = 157,327,344
T = 26,570,952
B =
0.965 T - 0.01025 PH - 0.01025 AH
B =
24,028,062 - 55.842 A
A =
($ 0.0025/$9.00) B
B =
24,028,062 - 55.842 (0.0025/9) B
B =
24,028,062/1.0155 = 23,661,607
A =
6573 kw
* - Above is copy of Page 2 (Rev. 2), Revised Exhibit A,
of BPA-WPPSS Exchange Agreement
CONDITION I (cont.)
CALCULATION OF REVENUE
WITH 5 CFS MIN. RELEASE AT INTAKE
DURING CRITICAL YEAR 1936-37
ENERGY VALUE 1.25 mills/KWH
CAPACITY VALUE $0.95/KW
Revenue due to flow during critical
period 9/1 - 4/15
Capacity 7.5 mo. x
28,878 KW x $.95 = $205,756
Exchange Capacity
6573 x 12 x $.95 = 74,932
Energy 0.01
(28878 + 6573) 5448 x $.00125
= 0.01 35451 x 5448 x 1.25 mills = 2,414
$283,102
Revenue due to flow during
non-critical period
Capacity 4.5 x
28878 x $.95 = $123,453
Energy 167.5 x
123 x 3312 x 0.975 x 0.95
x 1.25 mills x 103 = 79,004
$202,456
ANNUAL TOTAL $485,558
CONDITION
2
Calculation
of annual value of 3 cfs min. release at intake and 18 cfs min. flow at mouth
based upon decrease of firm capability during critical Northwest hydro period
of September 1, 1936 to April 15, 1937.
|
MONTH |
|
YEAR |
|
USGS FLOW RECORD AT INTAKE
GAGE 14-2255 |
|
EST. FLOW AT MOUTH BASED ON
USGS RECORD RECORDED INFLOW SAME MONTH |
|
INFLOW BELOW INTAKE |
|
INTAKE RELEASE REQUIRED TO
MAINTAIN 18 CFS AT MOUTH |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Sept. |
1936 |
43.5 |
49.5 (1965) |
6.0 |
12.0 |
|
||||||||||||||
|
Oct. |
1936 |
31.0 |
36.6 (1965) |
5.0 |
12.4 |
|
||||||||||||||
|
Nov. |
1936 |
21.5 |
30.2 (1965) |
8.7 |
9.3 |
|
||||||||||||||
|
Dec. |
1936 |
49.4 |
57.0 (1914) |
7.6 |
10.4 |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.0 |
||||||||||||||
|
Jan. |
1937 |
32.9 |
46.2 (1913) |
13.3 |
4.7 |
|
||||||||||||||
|
Feb. |
1937 |
31.2 |
45.4 (1915) |
14.2 |
3.8 |
|
||||||||||||||
|
March |
1937 |
40.1 |
46.2 (1912) |
6.1 |
11.9 |
|
||||||||||||||
|
April (1-15) |
1937 |
57.6 |
81.4 (1965) |
23.8 |
3 |
|
||||||||||||||
|
CALCULATIONS OF EXCHANGE ENERGY |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
MONTH |
|
AVAIL. FOR |
|
HOURS |
|
H/K |
|
GENERATION |
|
|||||||||||
|
Sept. |
31.5 |
720 |
123 |
2,789,640 |
||||||||||||||||
|
Oct. |
18.6 |
744 |
123 |
1,702,123 |
||||||||||||||||
|
Nov. |
12.2 |
720 |
123 |
1,080,043 |
||||||||||||||||
|
Dec. |
39.0 |
744 |
123 |
3,568,968 |
||||||||||||||||
|
Jan. |
28.2 |
744 |
123 |
2,580,638 |
||||||||||||||||
|
Feb. |
27.4 |
678 |
123 |
2,284,995 |
||||||||||||||||
|
Mar. |
28.2 |
744 |
123 |
2,580,638 |
||||||||||||||||
|
Apr. |
54.6 |
360 |
122.5 |
2,407,860 |
||||||||||||||||
|
Average |
32.0 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
TOTAL |
|
5448 |
|
18,994,725 |
||||||||||||||||
CONDITION 2 (Con't.)
CALCULATION OF EXCHANGE CAPACITY
AVAILABLE WITH FISH RELEASE = 18 CFS
AT MOUTH OF LAKE CREEK
Plant Capacity = 31,500 KW
Less Losses Energy
= 2.5 mills/KWH
5% Value
3.5% Capacity =
$9.00/KW Year
Value
Adjustable Capacity = 28,878 KW
P = 28,878 KW
H = 5448 hrs. - Sept. 1 - April 15
PH = 157,327,344 KWH
T = 18,994,725 + Draft of 4,500,000 = 23,494,725
B = 0.965 T - 0.01025 PH - 0.01025 AH
= 22,672,410 -
1.025 x 2.8878 x 5.448 x 105
-
1.025 5.448 (A) x 101
= 22,672,410 -
1,612,605 - 55,842(A)
= 21,059,805 -
55.842 A
A = ($0.0025/$9.00) B
B = 21,059,805 - 5.5842 2.5 B x 10-2
9.0
= 21,059,805 -
0.0155117 B
B (1.0155117) - 21,059,805
B = 21059805/1.0155117 = 20,738,121 KWH
A = ($0.0025/9.00) B = 2.5x20738121 x 104
9.0
A = 5,761 KW
CONDITION 2 (Con't.)
CALCULATED REVENUE OF PACKWOOD
18 CFS Min. Flow at Mouth and 3 CFS Min. Release
at Intake
During Critical Year 1936-37
Energy
Value = 1.25 mils/KWH
Capacity Value =
0.95’/KW/MO
Revenue
due to flow during critical period Sept. 1 thru Apr. 15
Capacity 7.5 28,878 x 0.85 MO KW$ = $ 205,758
KW/MO
Exchange 5,761
x 12 x 0.95 KW MO$ = 65,675
Capacity KW/MO
Energy = 0.01 (28,878 + 5761) 5448 x 0.00125
= 0.01
3.4639 5.448 1.25 x 102 2,358
$
273,789
Revenue
due to flow during non-critical period
Capacity 4.5 x
28,878 x 0.95 MO KW $ = $ 123,453
KW/MO
Exchange 166.9
x 123 x 3312 x 0.975 x 0.95 cfs
KW/hrs $ x 0.00125
cfs KWH
= 1.669 x 1.23 x 3.312 x 0.975 x 0.95 x
1.25 x 104 = $
78,720
$
202,509
ANNUAL TOTAL $ 476,298
|
APR. |
71.6-3 |
= |
68.6 cfs |
|
MAY |
161-3 |
= |
158 cfs |
|
JUNE |
309-3 |
= |
306 cfs |
|
JULY |
172-7 |
= |
165 cfs |
|
AUG. |
65.3-11.9 |
= |
53.4 cfs |
|
|
|
|
166.9 cfs |
CONDITION
3
The
following is a calculation of annual production based on number of cfs min.
release of intake and 10 cfs min. flow at mouth; August thru December and 15
cfs; January thru July.
|
MONTH |
|
YEAR |
|
USGS RECORD |
|
EST. LOCAL INFLOW |
|
|
|
AVAIL. FOR GEN. |
|
H/K |
|
HRS. |
|
|
|
|
SEPT. |
36 |
43.5 |
6.0 |
4 |
39.5 |
123 |
720 |
3,498,120 |
|||||||||
|
OCT. |
36 |
31.0 |
5.6 |
4.4 |
26.6 |
123 |
744 |
2,434,219 |
|||||||||
|
NOV. |
36 |
21.5 |
8.7 |
2 |
19.5 |
123 |
720 |
1,726,920 |
|||||||||
|
DEC. |
36 |
49.4 |
7.6 |
2.4 |
47.0 |
123 |
744 |
4,301,064 |
|||||||||
|
JAN. |
37 |
32.9 |
13.3 |
2 |
30.9 |
123 |
744 |
2,827,720 |
|||||||||
|
FEB. |
37 |
31.2 |
14.2 |
2 |
29.9 |
123 |
678 |
2,493,480 |
|||||||||
|
MARCH |
37 |
40.1 |
6.1 |
3.9 |
46.2 |
123 |
744 |
4,227,854 |
|||||||||
|
APR. 1-15 |
37 |
57.6 |
23.8 |
2 |
55.6 |
122.5 |
360 |
2,451,960 |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Draft |
4,500,000 |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Critical |
28,461,337 |
||||||||||
|
APR 16-30 |
37 |
71.6 |
30 |
2 |
69.6 |
123 |
360 |
3,081,883 |
|||||||||
|
MAY |
37 |
161 |
72 |
2 |
159 |
123 |
744 |
14,550,408 |
|||||||||
|
JUNE |
37 |
309 |
50 |
2 |
307 |
123 |
720 |
27,187,920 |
|||||||||
|
JULY |
37 |
172 |
50 |
2 |
170 |
123 |
744 |
15,557,040 |
|||||||||
|
AUG. |
37 |
65.3 |
5.1 |
4.9 |
60.4 |
123 |
744 |
5,527,324 |
|||||||||
CONDITION
3 (Cont.)
PROPOSED FISH RELEASE TO
MAINTAIN 15 CFS, JAN. JUL. AND 10 CFS, AUG. DEC.
MIN. FLOW AT MOUTH WITH MIN. 2 CFS RELEASE AT INTAKE
P = 28878
H = 5448
PH = 157,327,344
T = 28,461,337
B = 0.965
T 0.0.025 PH 0.01025 AH
B = 27,465,190
1,612,605 55.842 (A)
B = 25,852,585
55842 2.5 B x 10-2
9.0
= 25852585 =
25,457,685
1.0155117
A = 2.5 B x10-7 = x 104 = 7072
9.0
Critical
Period Revenue
Capacity = 205,756
Exchange
Capacity 7072 x 12 x 0.95 =
80,620
Energy 0.01
(28878 + 7072) 5448 0.00125 = 2,448
288,824
Noncritical
Period Revenue
Capacity = 123,453
Energy 170.2 x 123
x 3312 x 975 x 0.95 x 00125 = 80,276
TOTAL
REVENUE 492,553
This
program would cost $4,219/yr. or $1,507/cfs.
1. Based on present rates and control period, the cost of
maintaining 5 cfs min. fish release of intake over a fifty year period
compounded at 5 percent annually would be:
$11,234/yr. x 209,348 = $2,352,000
2. The similar cost of maintaining a minimum of 18 cfs at the outlet
would be:
$20,424/yr. x 209,348 = $4,275,000
3. The cost of maintaining 10 cfs, August - December and 15 cfs
January - July, at the mouth with 2 cfs minimum at the intake would be:
$4,219/yr. x 209,348 = $ 883,239