RESIDENCE

4223 E. 73RD ST.

SEATTLE 15, WASH.

LA. 3-4383

WILLIAM F. ROYCE, Ph.D.

FISHERY RESEARCH BIOLOGIST

DIRECTOR, FISHERIES RESEARCH INSTITUTE

UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON

SEATTLE 5, WASHINGTON

CAMPUS PHONE

L.A. 4-6000, EXT. 2004

                                                     January 14, 1965

 

Mr. Owen W. Hurd, Managing Director
Washington Public Power Supply System
P.O. Box 672
Kennewick, Washington

Dear Mr. Hurd:

      This letter is a commentary on certain aspects of proposed changes in lake level and the drop structure at Packwood Lake. It has been prepared at the request of Mr. S. K. Billingsley. The comments will represent my professional opinions based on approximately 30 years experience with many diverse kinds of fishery investigations. I hold B.S. and Ph.D. degrees from Cornell University where I majored in Fisheries Biology. I have been the Director of the Fisheries Research Institute at the University of Washington since 1958. Prior to that time I was employed as a Fishery Research Biologist by the U.S. Bureau of Commercial Fisheries for 16 years with headquarters successively in Cambridge, Massachusetts, New Bedford, Massachusetts, Woods Hole, Massachusetts, Honolulu, Hawaii, and Juneau, Alaska. In Juneau, Alaska, I was Assistant Regional Director in charge of research. Prior to working for the Bureau of Commercial Fisheries I was employed by the Conservation Department of the State of New York and by Cornell University in investigations of trout and warm water fishes.

Effect of Opening Drop Structure to Permit Release of up to 300 cfs During Flood Water Periods on Escape of Fish

The species of fish of concern in Packwood Lake is rainbow trout which has been resident there for many years. Substantial populations have existed because the lake is reported to have provided good angling and records of the Washington Department of Game show that as many as 3,021,000 eggs were taken artificially from the trout in Packwood Lake. This would mean that approximately 1,500 adult females were stripped. If we assume that these were accompanied by an equal number of males it would appear that spawning grounds in the lake tributaries supported at least 3,000 adult fish at the time these spawn-taking operations were under way.

These populations persisted in the lake despite the regular annual floods down the outlet creek. Within a few hundred yards of the lake the creek bed is so precipitous that no fish can migrate up to the lake. It seems clear that this stock of fish is non-migratory and did not tend to leave the lake under natural conditions in numbers which seriously reduced the populations. In my judgment, they would be no more apt to leave the lake through an opening in the drop structure.


Effect of Submerged Trees on Fish Habitat

Unquestionably the dead trees which have fallen in the lake around the shores have benefited the fish. The tangle of limbs provides important habitat for young fish where they can escape from their larger relatives and the debris encourages the growth of fish food organisms. Somewhat similar brush shelters have been artificially provided in a number of lakes in order to enhance the environment for fish.

Effect of Reduced Lake Level During Spawning Season on Access to Spawning Streams

The rainbow trout ascend the tributary streams of Packwood Lake during May and June to spawn. During the spawn-taking operations which were conducted by the Washington Department of Game from 1933 to 1940 they were captured by weirs from 10 to 100 yards above the mouths of the streams. The State records show that during most of these years eyed eggs were shipped to other hatcheries from the Packwood station between June 12 and July 27. These probably had been held in the Packwood station for about one month before they were eyed and sturdy enough to ship, and hence it appears that the spawn-taking operations occurred from early May to the latter part of June which would correspond approximately to the spawning period.

The normal level of the lake has been considered to be about 2855 feet. The maximum high water attained under natural conditions was about 2858.5. Usually the lake was near its normal level during the first month of the year and then commonly rose to maxima during May, June and July. Then usually the level decreased with only occasional high water conditions during late autumn or early winter.

Under the conditions of operation by the licensee it is expected that lake level may be reduced to a minimum of 2850.5 during the fall and winter and I understand from Mr. Billingsley that during recent months the lake occasionally has been down to this level.

With low lake levels and flood water conditions in the streams it may be expected that the streams will cut channels down to lake level which are entirely comparable to the channels they occupy immediately above the highest water mark. One need look no further than at the intertidal channels of streams which empty into the ocean to see that this is almost always the case. It should be extremely simple to observe whether this is the case at Packwood Lake and in a remote chance that a stream is spread out in a fashion which makes it difficult for fish to ascend it should be simple to start a channel cutting through the stream delta in a few hours by one man with a hand shovel.


I note further from the U.S.G.S. gauge records for the years 1960-63 that the minimum levels during May and June varied between 5.70 and 5.93 and the maxima between 6.88 and 7.68. Thus it was normal for the lake to vary in level during these two months between 1 and 1.7 feet.

In summary, I believe that it is highly unlikely that changes in lake level during May and June would in any way interfere with access to the spawning streams. If by remote chance it does it could be easily observed and easily corrected.

Sincerely yours,

 

 

WFR:ac