

BEFORE THE
FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION
PROJECT NO. 2244
ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT
FOR
PACKWOOD LAKE HYDROELECTRIC
PROJECT
JUNE 1971
Special
Contributors:
William F. Royce, PhD.
Professor and Associate Dean
College of Fisheries
University of Washington
Stanley
P. Gessel, PhD. Professor and Associate Dean
College of Forestry Resources
University of Washington
WASHINGTON PUBLIC
POWER
SUPPLY SYSTEM R.
W. Beck & Associates
130 Vista Way Consulting
Engineers
Kennewick, Washington Seattle, Washington
NO. 73
TABLE OF CONTENTS
STATEMENT
INTRODUCTION
GENERAL
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Packwood Lake General - Page 1
Intake Structure General - Page 2
Drop Structure General - Page 3
Concrete Pipeline General - Page 4
Power Tunnels General - Page 4
Surge Tank & Butterfly Valve General - Page 4
Penstock General - Page 5
Powerhouse General - Page 5
Tailrace General - Page 6
Roads & Trails General - Page 6
Project Access General - Page 7
Project Uses Beneficial to Man General - Page 9
Background Factors of Justification
for the Project General - Page 13
Environmental Impact of the Proposed
Action Sect. I.A. - Page 1
Fishwater
Bypass Releases Sect. I.B.1a - Page 1
Packwood
Lake Level Sect. I.B.1b - Page 1
May-June
Rule Curve Sect. I.B.1c - Page 1
Duplicate
Gauge Removal Sect. I.B.1d - Page 1
Land
Habitat Wildlife & Aesthetics Sect.
I.B.2 - Page 1
Adverse Environmental Effects -
Water Pollution Sect. II - Page 1
-2-
Public
Safety Measures Sect. II - Page 2
Wildlife Sect. II - Page 4
Recreational
Values Sect. II - Page 4
Alternatives to Proposed Action -
Operating Modes Sect. III - Page 1
Short Term Vs. Long Term Productivity -
Cumulative Effects Sect. IV.A. - Page 1
Comparative
Effects Sect. IV.B. - Page 1
Irreversible & Irretrievable
Commitments Resources Sect. V. - Page 1
LIST OF PHOTOS
Aerial View of Project Features Frontispiece
Packwood Lake General - Page 2
Intake Structure General - Page 2
Drop Structure General - Page 3
Penstock General - Page 5
Powerhouse General - Page 5
Roads General - Page 6
Parking
Lot General - Page 7
Trails General - Page 7
Lake
Creek Sect.
I.B.1a - Page 1
LIST OF FIGURES
Isometric Drawing of Project Features Frontispiece
Population Distribution - Figure 1 Sect. I.A. - Page 4
LIST OF TABLES
Survey of Registered Visitors to
Packwood Lake Sect. I.A. -
Table 1
LIST OF EXHIBITS
Exhibit I - July 2, 1969 FPC Letter
Exhibit II - Packwood Lake Visitor Facility
Exhibit III - Packwood Lake Resort
Letter
Exhibit IV - Memorandum of Agreement
STATEMENT
The
Washington Public Power Supply System, hereinafter called the "Supply
System", operates the Packwood Lake Hydroelectric Project near the town of
Packwood in Lewis County, Washington. The Supply System is a municipal
corporation and joint operating agency of the State of Washington whose membership
is composed of 20 publicly owned electric utilities located in the State of
Washington.
The
Packwood Lake Hydroelectric Project, hereinafter called the
"Project," was licensed by the Federal Power Commission on July 7,
1960 and the license amended February 28, 1962, and designated as Federal Power
Commission License No. 2244. The Project is located within the Gifford Pinchot
National Forest, and consists of a diversion dam at the outlet of Packwood
Lake, a 19,000 foot pipeline, and a 6,000 foot penstock to convey water to a
turbine-generator rated 27,500 KVA at the base of the mountain adjacent to the
town of Packwood. Packwood Lake is the source of the water for the Project. It
is a natural lake at an elevation of 2857 feet approximately 1800 feet above
the powerhouse.
Power
from the Project is delivered to the Bonneville Power Administration for resale
to certain member public utility districts throughout the State of Washington.
The policy of the Supply System is to produce the optimum amount of power at
the lowest cost, while protecting the forestry resources and enhancing the
recreational opportunities at Packwood Lake.
The
Supply System has constructed new roads and trails to provide public access to
Packwood Lake. The Supply System maintains a stipulated release of lake water
into Lake Creek, which is the natural outlet of Packwood Lake, to protect
resident stream fish. The license further requires that the Supply System
maintain the lake level at approximately its natural level during the recreation
season from May 1 to September 15.
At
the time the Project was completed in June of 1964, it was recognized that
certain amendments to the license were needed to optimize power production from
the Project as detailed in the feasibility studies. These amendments also
enhance the recreational use of Packwood Lake during the recreation season. The
Supply System recommended on November 12, 1970 that the Federal Power
Commission consider four modifications to the license which would permit a more
flexible mode of operation and enhance the recreation use of Packwood Lake.
INTRODUCTION
This
report is submitted in response to the Federal Power Commission letter of April
2, 1971, requesting information concerning environmental matters as required by
Section 102(2)C of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, 42 U.S.C.
paragraph 4332(2) (C) effective January 1, 1970. The FPC letter, signed by
Kenneth F. Plumb, Acting Secretary of the Commission, contains a description of
the environmental information needed to conform to the requirements of the Act.
The
Commission's request for the report results from the Supply System's request
for a review of certain provisions of the Federal Power Commission License for
the Project (License No. 2244). A report on these License provisions dated
November 12, 1970 was submitted to the Federal Power Commission in response to
the FPC July 2, 1969 letter signed by Mr. F. Stewart Brown, Chief, Bureau of
Power (Exhibit 1). The four items being requested for consideration by the
Federal Power Commission, which constitutes the contemplated action under the
National Environmental Policy Act, are summarized as follows:
(1)
incorporate a Memorandum of Agreement dated November 2, 1967, signed by
the Licensee and the U.S. Forest Service, Bureau of Sports Fisheries and
Wildlife, Bureau of Commercial Fisheries, Washington Department of Fisheries,
and Washington Game Commission in accordance with Article 39 and providing for
minimum fishwater releases into Lake Creek and maintenance of stream
improvements; (2) amend Article 37 to establish the minimum operating pool at
elevation 2849 during the period September 16 through April 30, in lieu of
minimum elevation 2850.5 now prescribed,
to allow a full 8 foot
drawdown during winter critical hydro period; (3) authorize adoption of rule
curve to permit pool levels ranging from elevations 2854 to 2857.0 ±
0.5 from May 1 to June 18 depending on prediction of runoff, to minimize
hardships in obtaining the prescribed May 1 elevation 2857 in dry years and
enhance operating pool control during peak runoff periods in years of heavy
flows; (4) discontinue the requirement for duplicated U.S.G.S. gauging
facilities below the drop structure.
The
Supply System's position with reference to each of these proposed amendments is
as follows:
1. Pursuant to the requirements of Article 39
and the studies conducted by the Supply System and others concerning the level
of releases from Packwood Lake into Lake Creek, it has been determined that
Lake Creek contains little, if any, resident sport fishery and, in fact, during
much of its course is so steep and precipitous as to be almost inaccessible to
fishermen. There does exist an area for sports fishery, as well as for
propogation of trout, in the reach of Lake Creek from the confluence with the
Cowlitz River up to a point approximately two miles above the confluence. All
interested agencies have concurred that by releasing three cfs from Packwood
Lake at the point of the headworks on Lake Creek, and with the natural addition
to Lake Creek from various tributaries, that there will be available
approximately 15 cfs at or near the mouth of Lake Creek. The Licensee will
supplement this flow up to five cfs during months of dry weather to facilitate
the desired 15 cfs flow. To improve fishery propagation in the area, the Supply
System has agreed to construct and maintain certain improvements to the natural
spawning area found in this reach of Lake Creek. Recognizing the benefits to be
derived from this undertaking,
the Forest Service, as well as
the appropriate fish and game agencies of the State of Washington, and the
Department of Interior, have entered into the Memorandum of Agreement set forth
in Exhibit No. 4. It is the position of the Supply System that with the completion
of the improvements at the confluence of Lake Creek, and the modifications of
the requirement for fishwater releases, that the original purpose of the
conditional nature of Article 39 will have been met, and that the License on
this point should be permanently amended to reflect the arrangements set forth
in the Memorandum of Agreement.
2. It is the position of the Supply System that
the amendment of Article 37 to establish a minimum operating lake level at
elevation 2849 during the period September 16 through April 30, is essential to
regain the economic operation of the Project on which the original license was
based. According to Supply System Fishery and Forestry consultants, operation
at this level during the non-recreation season will in no way adversely affect
recreation use of Packwood Lake. Such operation will allow the Project to
deliver the originally licensed energy during an extremely dry critical hydro
period (one in thirty years). Presently the "one in thirty year"
critical hydro period that limits the annual income for sale of firm
power was the August 1, 1936 to April 15, 1937 water conditions.
Since
August 1 always will fall in the recreation period each year, the lake level
will be at 2857 feet msl (± 0.5 feet) and 2849 feet msl should therefore be the
winter drawdown limit to furnish the originally licensed eight feet. Studies
have
indicated that fluctuation of
the lake level down to 2849 feet during this period will have no adverse
effects on fish and wildlife resident in the Packwood Lake area. The License
should be amended to permit this mode of operation.
3. The adoption of a rule curve to permit pool
levels ranging from elevation 2854 to 2857, from May 1 to June 18, depending
upon predicted runoff, will benefit the operation of the Project in several
ways. Based on the operating records since initial startup of the Project it is
the position of the Supply System that operation on the rule curve during this
period of time would tend to avoid any potential adverse effects on the
shoreline of Packwood Lake. Further, such operation would serve the best
interests of recreation use at the lake from and after the beginning of the
recreation season which, in high flow years, does not commence until after June
1. Such operation would minimize the effects of flooding in Lake Creek, and
thereby help to protect against adverse effects on the spawning improvements
constructed by the Supply System of Lake Creek near the confluence with the
Cowlitz River. It is the position of the Supply System that amendment of the
License to permit operation under the rule curve during this period of time
would benefit the Project while contributing to the recreational uses of
Packwood Lake and environs.
During
the period 1965 through 1970 the lake overtopped the drop structure an average
of 6.3 days per year but 26 of the total 38 days of overtopping occurred in
1969 when a large flood runoff was experienced. Prolonged periods of
overtopping could cause shoreline tree damage, though none was identified due to
1969
lake levels. A rule curve
allowing for May and early June 2854-2855 feet msl elevation, when flow
predictions are more than 110 percent of the 50 year average, would reduce the
risk of any shoreline effects.
4. The United States Geological Survey presently
operates two gauging facilities on Lake Creek. One is located near the intake
Structure downstream from Packwood Lake, and the other on the lower reaches of
Lake Creek near the confluence with the Cowlitz River. Since the Memorandum of
Agreement addresses the measurement of the flow of Lake Creek at its lower
reaches, the continued use of the duplicate gauging station at the upper
portion of Lake Creek near the Project Intake Structure is of no particular
value and should be discontinued.
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
The
Packwood Lake Hydroelectric Project occupies lands of the Gifford Pinchot
National Forest and approximately 30 acres of Supply System owned land in the
Cowlitz River Valley. From the initial consideration of Project development and
throughout its planning design, construction and operation, it has been the
objective of the Supply System to provide maximum protection of the forest
resource and enhance the recreational opportunity through public utilization of
Project roads, trails, bridges and other facilities shown by the frontispiece
to the extent these uses are consistent with Project purposes and operational
requirements. Under terms of the FPC License 2244, design and operation of the
Project has been carried out with rigid restraints to preserve the natural
resources and encourage beneficial byproduct uses.
The
Project consists of a diversion structure a short distance downstream from the
discharge of Packwood Lake, an intake structure, and a 23,000 foot pipeline to
convey water through two tunnels and around the mountain to a surge tank and
penstock a short distance southeast of the town of Packwood. The underground
powerhouse is located at the base of the mountain adjacent to the town of
Packwood with a tailrace discharging into the Cowlitz River.
A
summary description of the Project structures is as follows:
1. Packwood Lake
The
natural elevation of Packwood Lake lies at an elevation of 2,857 feet
approximately 1,805 feet
|
above the Project powerhouse. Packwood Lake
and Lake Creek are bounded on the southwest by Snyder Mountain, elevation
5,030 feet, and on the north-west by mountain ridges with elevations ranging
to 5,300 feet. During
the recreation season, May 1 through September 15, Packwood Lake is
controlled |
|
|
|
to an optimum recreational level of 2857
feet, ± 0.5 feet. During the remainder of the year the requirements of the
Project operation for critical hydro period generation originally provided
for lowering the lake level not more than eight feet below the summer lake level. |
||
|
2. Intake Structure |
|
|
|
The Project intake structure is
located approxi-mately 360 feet downstream from the outlet of Packwood Lake.
This structure shown in the inset houses trash racks, stop logs, traveling
fish screens and a fixed wheel gate to control the water entering the 72 inch
pre-tensioned concrete pipeline. The intake structure rises 22 feet above the
maximum lake elevation. |
|
|
The
intake structure also houses a 24-inch fishwater release pipeline with remote
controlled butterfly valve for metering and releasing required amounts of water
to maintain the fishwater release flows required by the license. The fishwater
release flows are automatically indicated, totalized, recorded and controlled
at the Project powerhouse.
|
3. Drop Structure |
|
|
The
drop structure located adjacent to the intake |
|
|
structure extends 85 feet in width and is
tied into impervious earth fill cutoff walls on each side extending to the
natural embankment. The knap of the drop structure at elevation 2858.5 will
allow water to spill only by overtopping the structure at times when seasonal
high flood runoff flows exceed the capacity of the Project and the ability of
the lake to absorb the peak discharges. |
|
During
periods of normal operation, the lake level is controlled from the powerhouse
by a preplanned program of plant operation conforming to system load
requirements and the Federal Power Commission license.
The
drop structure is designed to accommodate flood flows 5.5 times the maximum
recorded Packwood Lake runoff of 1400 cfs.
4. Concrete Pipeline
Approximately
18,000 feet of 72 inch pretensioned concrete pipe conveys the water from the
lake to the surge tank and through the two power tunnels. The 72 inch
pretensioned pipeline is buried under a minimum of four feet of cover on a
pipeline bench varying between 20 and 150 feet in width depending upon terrain.
The pretensioned pipe has a minimum wall thickness of 2-1/16 inches with
standard lengths of 32 feet except in areas where 20-foot lengths were used to
follow sharper contours of the mountainside.
5. Power Tunnels
Two
power tunnels carry Project waters through Snyder Mountain where the steep
terrain or unstable material made construction of a pipeline undesirable.
The
first power tunnel, located approximately 2,000 feet downstream from the outlet
of Packwood Lake, is approximately 1,730 feet long and lined in a circular
configuration.
The
second power tunnel located approximately 3,000 feet below the downstream
outlet of Tunnel No. 1 is roughly 3,200 feet in length and is partly lined in
an inverted horseshoe configuration.
6. Surge Tank and Butterfly Valve
The
Project's surge tank rises approximately 191 feet above the pipeline invert and
approximately 140 feet above the natural ground level. The surge tank is
painted green and is barely visible from the valley floor. The valve house
located at the base of the surge tank is the downstream terminus of the 23,000
foot conduit from Packwood Lake. The
|
valve house is located underground and is
accessible by road except during winter months. |
|
|
7. Penstock |
|
|
The
steel penstock extending from the surge tank to the powerhouse is
approximately 5,600 feet long and is anchored |
|
|
at 12 locations by concrete anchors located
at points where the contour of the mountain requires changes in alignment or
grade. The thickness of the steel in the penstock varies from 7/16 to 1-5/16
inches with an outside diameter varying from 57 inches down to 46-1/2 inches
where it enters the powerhouse. |
|
|
|
|
|
8. Powerhouse The
Project powerhouse is located underground near the town of Packwood with only
the control building rising above ground surface. The powerhouse contains a
two-jet (vertical-undershot) impulse turbine with a maximum potential of
31,500 kilowatts operating at 360 rpm. The |
|
average annual energy is approximately 101
million KWH delivered to the Project participants.
9. Tailrace
The
Project tailrace is approximately 8,100 feet in length carrying water from the
Project powerhouse to the Cowlitz River. The tailrace is lined with asphalt
with a width at the top of the asphalt lining of approximately nine feet and
approximately 29 feet at the base. The average depth of the lined part of the
tailrace is 5-3/4 feet. A fishscreen and trash rack is located at the point
where the water is returned to the Cowlitz River.
10. Roads and Trails
During
Project construction, the Licensee constructed approximately 3.5 miles of
permanent graveled roads built to Forest Service standards for future public
use. In addition, the Licensee constructed a new parking lot located at the end
of the Project access
|
road
to accommodate a minimum of 30 cars and five trailers. From the parking lot to Packwood Lake, a
distance of four miles, the Licensee constructed a new hiking trail to
permanent Forest Service standards for public recreation access to the Lake
and semi-wilderness area beyond. This trail is designed to take |
|
|
maximum advantage of scenic vistas and
heavily timbered scenes. The permanent Project access road and trail are
maintained and administered by the U. S. Forest Service. The
total Project area, approximating 600 acres of which approximately 200 acres
required clearing, has been reseeded and fertilized. In |
|
|
some areas where special attention was
required water has been added to foster new growth. In addition, in certain
areas, the Licensee has planted indigenous trees and vines to encourage
return to a natural condition. |
|
|
11. Project Access |
|
|
The upper portions of the Project,
including the facilities at Packwood Lake, are not accessible by road. The
Licensee's operation and maintenance are accomplished by using foot trails
and tote-gotes during periods when
the access is available. Normally, the upper end of the Project is completely
inaccessible, except by helicopter, for
approximately 30-60 days |
|
during the winter. Accordingly maintenance
criteria require special considerations to accommodate this inaccessibility. In
addition, for approximately three more months during the winter, access can be
gained only through the use of snowcats and snowshoes. This period of limited
accessibility depends on snow conditions, but usually extends through April and
during certain years through the first half of May.
Project Uses Beneficial to
Man
The
Project was conceived, designed and is operated to be in harmony with the dual
objectives of ample low cost electric energy and a desirable and improved
resource for recreation uses. In conjunction with the Project planning,
construction and operation, $572,586.00 was invested in non-power recreation
and resource protective measures to assure the continuance of this harmony
between the two purposes.
The
use of hydroelectric energy eliminates adverse impacts of alternate thermal
sources of power generation on air and water quality, enhances public access to
the recreation area and incorporates all of the environmental requirements that
are now, almost ten years later, becoming of primary concern to the general
populace. In addition to its contribution in serving the power needs of the
Pacific Northwest, the Project on a number of occasions has been called upon to
serve the local Cowlitz River Valley areas when outside sources of power were
unavailable due to transmission failures and other planned or unplanned
outages. Since June 1964, the Project has carried all or portions of the
Cowlitz River Valley electrical system load over 1100 hours. This 1100 hour
total is comprised of many separate short periods varying in length down to
several minutes in duration.
Electricity
An
allotment of power from the intake structure is reserved for use by the U. S.
Forest Service at the new Packwood Lake Guard Station and is used for heating,
lighting and cooking. In addition, a small allotment has been made available to
the Packwood Lake
Resort on
an "as available" basis for use in the main cabin for lighting,
cooking, washing and refrigeration. The sleeping cabins use wood stoves for
heating and kerosene for lighting.
Radio and Television
Services
The Packwood Television Broadcaster, Inc. has installed a
television broadcasting repeater station at the top of the penstock and
antennas are mounted atop the Licensee's surge tank. This facility furnishes
television reception to the upper Cowlitz River Valley where TV was not
received prior to the project construction. A small allotment of power for the
television repeater station is provided by the Licensee.
The National Park Service uses the surge tank facilities and
Licensee power source for a small repeater installation to bounce radio
communications from the West to the East side of Mt. Rainier. This repeater
station provides a reliable communication system for Mt. Rainier and the
surrounding National Park area.
Emergency Communications
and Assistance
The Supply System intake structure located a short distance
downstream from the outlet of the Packwood Lake contains a commercial telephone
available for emergency use. The concessionaire at Packwood Lake, Mrs. Virginia
Hunter, has access to the telephone for emergency and non-routine use. In
addition, the concessionaire and its employees provide an invaluable public
service in assisting with advice, information, enforcement of Forest Service
regulations, first aid and other aspects of the health and comfort of the
general public visiting the area.
In addition, the United States Forest
Service assigns a Forest Service employee to Packwood Lake on an intermittent
basis for maintenance of campgrounds, sanitary facilities, garbage disposal and
compliance with the Forest Service regulations. When on duty at the lake, the
Forest Service employee has access to a Forest Service telephone line installed
by the Licensee.
Background Factors of
Justification for the Project
The Project was the first Supply System undertaking to utilize
the joint participation concept for meeting power requirements of Supply System
members. This cooperative effort of joint participation in the Project was
conceived approximately ten years prior to the announcement of the
Hydro-Thermal Program concept developed by the Joint Power Planning Council in
the northwest. The Joint Power Planning Council now includes 109 public and
private utilities in the Pacific Northwest plus the Bonneville Power Administration.
Regional power requirements are growing at the rate of
approximately one million kilowatts per year and the non-Federal utilities have
been assigned the responsibility of planning, constructing and operating the
generating facilities to meet these growing requirements. The Federal
government's responsibilities, acting through the Bonneville Power
Administration, are limited to the supply of forced outage reserves, peaking
capacity, and most of the transmission grid.
While it remains true that all new hydroelectric projects have
irrevocable impact on the watershed and the immediate area, it remains that
electricity is required to solve many of the existing economic and
environmental problems. In addition, the public does benefit from enhanced public
use facilities, access, emergency aid and communication, and encouragement of
the use of natural and man-made resources.
Of all the available sources of electric energy, including
fossil fuels, nuclear and falling water, hydro is the lowest
cost, the most efficient
and does, overall, the least damage to the total environment while serving the
need of meeting load growth.
I. The Environmental Impact of the Proposed
Action
A. Population, pattern
and effects upon project resources.
The population density pattern surrounding the Packwood
Lake Hydroelectric Project is illustrated by Fig. 1 and is based on results of
the 1970 census.
The administration of the recreational use of the natural
resources of the Project area is a responsibility that has been retained by the
U. S. Forest Service. Accordingly, the Licensee's authority in terms of the
recreational use is limited to that of reporting on recreational facilities and
use, as has been done annually by submission of Federal Power Commission Form
80, as revised.
A detailed description of the Packwood Lake visitor facilities
is contained in Exhibit No. 2. In general the facilities include the Project
access road and parking lot, a four mile trail from parking lot to lake, a
Forest Service trail connecting to the Cascade Crest trail (approximately 10
miles distant), rowboats, hot meals, fishing supplies, sleeping cabins and two
campgrounds with water, sanitary facilities, and tables.
In the past, the Supply System has maintained a close and
cooperative liaison with the U. S. Forest Service and will continue to
cooperate on all Forest Service plans for maintenance and improvement of the
recreation facilities surrounding the Project.
A September 22, 1970 letter from Mrs. Hunter, the owner-operator
of the Packwood Lake Resort, is included as Exhibit 3 and was also included as
Exhibit 2 in the Supply System report
on recreation submitted
to the Federal Power Commission in November 1970. In addition, that report
contains a compilation of photographs of the various Project features.
Mrs. Virginia Hunter operates, by special Forest Service Annual
Use Permit, a small concession which provides meals, boat rentals and cabins at
Packwood Lake. This resort is located on the right bank of the lake near the
outlet. This concession is open May through September depending upon access
limitations due to snow pack during certain years in May. In the course of Mrs.
Hunter's operations, a registration of visitors to the concession as well as a
large percentage of people passing by the concession are recorded by date, name
and address. The record from 1962 through 1970 entitled "Survey of
Registered Visitors to Packwood Lake from April 1962 to 1970" is contained
in Table No. 1. This table illustrates that the number of registered visitors
has more than doubled since the period of Project construction. The general
status of recreation facilities available to the public using the Packwood Lake
area has not changed in any substantial degree since 1962.
The year prior to the operation of the Project there were 918
registered visitors. In the first year of operation (1964) more than 1,570
people visited the Project, and the number of visitors has increased with more
than 2500 visiting Packwood Lake in 1970. The steady increase of visitors over
the six year period is indicative of the growing popularity of the Project with
hikers, campers and fishermen. It is also a sign of the
times as growing numbers
of our people seek to escape the frustrations of modern life for the freer,
less demanding short-term experience of outdoor living, which permits
rejuvenation of the spirit, and closer relationship to nature.
With the ever increasing tempo of life, brought about by new
technologies and our growing population, the desire for a wilderness experience
on the part of modern man and his family will become more popular and, because
of its therapeutic value, more needed. It has also been predicted that because
of technology, future generations will have more time to pursue outdoor
recreation. Because of these factors, we can expect that our existing
recreational areas, such as Packwood Lake, already taxed to the limits, will
become even more crowded.
If unrestricted and unplanned use of the limited facilities by
the public is permitted, semi-wilderness areas like Packwood Lake will suffer
irreparable harm through erosion of trails, establishment of unmanaged
campsites, pollution from lack of sanitary facilities, litter accumulation of
the area, and greater probability of forest fires.

TABLE NO. I.A. – 1
SURVEY OF REGISTERED VISITORS TO PACKWOOD LAKE FROM APRIL
1962 TO 1970
|
YEAR |
WEEK OF MONTH |
APRIL |
MAY |
JUNE |
JULY |
AUG |
SEPT |
OCT |
TOTAL FOR |
||||||||
|
1962 |
1 2 3 4 |
|
- - - - |
|
- - 88 85 |
|
52 64 90 159 |
|
65 108 70 94 |
|
65 65 54 137 |
|
91 - - - |
|
- - - - |
|
|
|
TOTAL |
|
0 |
|
173 |
|
365 |
|
337 |
|
321 |
|
91 |
|
0 |
|
1,287 |
|
|
1963 |
1 2 3 4 |
|
- - - - |
|
- 46 54 53 |
|
53 66 52 84 |
|
87 37 59 74 |
|
96 43 30 63 |
|
21 - - - |
|
- - - - |
|
|
|
TOTAL |
|
0 |
|
153 |
|
255 |
|
257 |
|
232 |
|
21 |
|
0 |
|
918 |
|
|
1964 |
1 2 3 4 |
|
- - - - |
|
- - 9 76 |
|
56 96 67 135 |
|
164 160 121 200 |
|
100 79 94 109 |
|
81 23 - - |
|
4 - - - |
|
|
|
TOTAL |
|
0 |
|
85 |
|
354 |
|
645 |
|
382 |
|
104 |
|
4 |
|
1,574 |
|
|
1965 |
1 2 3 4 |
|
- - - 39 |
|
45 52 54 76 |
|
140 153 102 125 |
|
175 93 127 165 |
|
74 49 63 88 |
|
82 58 21 49 |
|
41 6 - - |
|
|
|
TOTAL |
|
39 |
|
227 |
|
520 |
|
560 |
|
274 |
|
210 |
|
47 |
|
1,877 |
|
|
1966 |
1 2 3 4 |
|
- - 51 27 |
|
43 58 61 126 |
|
255 160 197 140 |
|
192 137 136 160 |
|
69 115 83 124 |
|
198 55 3 17 |
|
17 5 8 - |
|
|
|
TOTAL |
|
78 |
|
288 |
|
752 |
|
625 |
|
391 |
|
273 |
|
30 |
|
2,437 |
|
|
1967 |
1 2 3 4 |
|
- - 63 33 |
|
25 71 79 343 |
|
177 249 167 235 |
|
150 135 172 155 |
|
126 102 132 75 |
|
- - - - |
|
- - 3 - |
|
|
|
TOTAL |
|
96 |
|
518 |
|
828 |
|
612 |
|
435 |
|
0 |
|
3 |
|
2,492 |
|
|
1968 |
1 2 3 4 |
|
- - 38 50 |
|
46 98 89 185 |
|
161 79 151 108 |
|
210 113 124 204 |
|
90 98 52 130 |
|
72 25 - - |
|
- - - - |
|
|
|
TOTAL |
|
88 |
|
418 |
|
499 |
|
651 |
|
370 |
|
97 |
|
0 |
|
2,123 |
|
|
1969 |
1 2 3 4 |
|
- - - - |
|
- - 77 190 |
|
42 202 101 156 |
|
99 93 113 203 |
|
83 171 87 74 |
|
-N.A. -" -" -" |
|
- - - |
|
|
|
TOTAL |
|
0 |
|
267 |
|
501 |
|
508 |
|
415 |
|
100est |
|
0 |
|
1,791 |
|
|
1970 |
1 2 3 4 |
|
- - - 57 |
|
62 85 97 198 |
|
134 186 129 178 |
|
147 132 167 152 |
|
163 132 170 97 |
|
90 N.A. " " |
|
N.A. " " " |
|
|
|
TOTAL |
|
57 |
|
442 |
|
627 |
|
598 |
|
562 |
|
250est |
|
20est |
|
2,556 |
|
I.B. Changes in Habitat and Effects on Project
Resources.
1. Aquatic habitat: Biological and Physical effects on fish or other principal biota.
The four items included in the request for revision of operating
procedures are all relatively minor changes and are expected to have little if
any effect on the environment. Further, some effects may be beneficial to the
aquatic habitat.
I.B.1a Fishwater Bypass Releases
Item one calls for the implementation of an agreement signed by
the Licensee, Washington Game Commission, Washington Department of Fisheries,
Bureau of Commercial Fisheries, Bureau of Sports Fisheries and Wildlife, and
the U. S. Forest Service. This agreement specifies minimum water releases from
Packwood Lake into Lake Creek and certain physical alterations in the lower
part of the stream (see Exhibit 4). The purpose is to conserve water and
enhance the aquatic habitat in the lower part of Lake Creek for the benefit of
trout that live in the stream and salmon that return there to spawn.
|
Lake Creek is a precipi-tous stream that plunges
into a canyon about 200 yards from Packwood Lake, below which it is nearly
inaccessible for about three miles. Below the canyon it is reasonably
accessible for the lower two miles before it flows into the Cowlitz River. The
ave-rage gradient of the upper 200 yards is about one |
|
percent, of the canyon
area about eight percent and the lower accessible region about five percent.
The natural flow regime is about 100 cfs average, with annual
maximum commonly between 300 and 500 cfs. The minimum flow of record was 19
cfs. The consequence of the high gradient and the peak runoff flows is a stream
bed through the canyon and on down to the mouth comprised principally of large
amounts of rubble and boulders. This is a relatively poor habitat for trout or
salmon spawning or for trout food organisms. The natural stream bed is nearly
lacking the large quiet pools that provide good resting and feeding conditions
for trout. The pools are mostly small turbulent areas among boulders.
Under the operational schedule of the Project, up to about 300
cfs will be diverted and the lake will provide for a storage capacity of up to
3,500 acre feet. It appears that practically all floods will be prevented
except for the very largest which may occur, but even these will be reduced in
total peak flow by at least half.
This reduction of peak flows will allow the stream bed to retain
more fine materials which will materially enhance the habitat for trout food
and salmon spawning.
The basic concept behind the Memorandum of Agreement between the
Supply System and the several environmental agencies is that the poor fish
habitat in this stream can be maintained or enhanced by some modest improvement
in the pools of the lower reaches. This would be done by a bulldozer as
indicated in the attached sketches. The pools will be constructed entirely
with rubble
and gravel with a maximum change in elevation from one to the next of about one
foot. Gravel will be added to improve the bottom conditions immediately. With
the decrease of maximum flood water conditions, such pools should be relatively
stable and provide better fishing and spawning conditions.
The flow in this lower stream during low water conditions will
come predominantly from existing springs below the lake. This inflow averages
around 20 cfs and did not go below five cfs at any time during the years 1964,
1965, and 1966 when special records were kept. In addition, observations and
photographs were made of the lower part of Lake Creek during the late summer of
1967 in order to compare stream areas during flows of from 10 to 20 cfs. It was
found that there was a negligible change in stream area between these two flow
levels.
Concern was felt also for the temperature of lower Lake Creek
during periods of low summer flow. This was studied from May to October 1966
and it was found that the summer maximum temperature in lower Lake Creek was
57°F. when the water at the outlet of the lake above was 67°F. There appears to
be no possibility of summer temperatures too warm for trout.
The minimum release of three cfs from the lake will avoid the
appearance of a dry stream bed in the 200 yards that is accessible between the
lake and the canyon, provide a small habitat for fish there who may interest
anglers who do not choose to fish the lake, and will augment the flow in the
lower stream. This fishwater release will be increased up to a maximum of five
cfs during the periods of lowest inflow downstream.
It is believed that these changes which will involve some improvement
in stream bottom type, no reduction in stream area, and the maintenance of
excellent water conditions for trout and salmon will enhance the habitat of the
lower stream.
Another provision of this agreement calls for the maintenance by
the Supply System of a suitable connection between Lake Creek and Cowlitz River
that will not inhibit access of salmon to the stream due to meandering of the
Cowlitz River.
I.B.1b Packwood Lake Level
The second action that is proposed is a reduction in the winter
minimum operating level from an elevation of 2850.5 feet to 2849.0 feet. This
elevation will limit the total Packwood Lake drawdown to a maximum of eight
feet below the summer lake level of 2857. This amount of drawdown is adequate
for the Project to deliver the originally licensed energy during an extremely
critical hydro period (one in thirty years). The present "one in thirty
years" critical hydro period that presently limits the annual
income for sale of firm power was the August 1 (1936) to April 15
(1937) water conditions.
Packwood Lake is in a steep-sided valley in which the average
gradient of the shore zone is around 10 percent. A draw-down of another 1-1/2
feet in the winter will reduce the total area of the lake by approximately 1.3
percent. No measurable effect on fish or other biota is to be expected.
I.B.1c May
and June Rule Curve
The
third action that is proposed is a modification of the lake level management
during the spring months through the adoption of a rule curve. This will be an
attempt to retain a modest storage capacity in the lake a little bit later in
the season during years of large snowpack in order to conserve water and reduce
overtopping of the dam. This would mean raising of the lake level from the
winter minimum to an intermediate level of 2854 feet by May 1 and then making
the final raise to 2857 feet, ± 0.5, for the summer operational levels when
the danger of floods is over.
Packwood
Lake has a large natural population of rainbow trout that spawn naturally in
the tributary streams. These are spring spawning trout that move into the
streams during April, May and June.
It
has been asserted that lowering the lake level might inhibit the entrance of
these trout into the streams, but all of the spawning streams have formed small
deltas along the shore of the lake and the stream bed is maintained through
these deltas regardless of the lake level. There has been no evidence of
blockage and the trout population is maintaining itself through natural
spawning despite heavy fishing pressure.
Adoption
of this rule curve and reduction in overtopping of the intake structure may
prevent some trout from being lost downstream where they might try to go during
periods of high water and during their attempts to move to spawning areas.
Furthermore, flooding of a spawning area may kill
trout eggs and larvae if it cuts off the flow
of water through the gravel where the eggs as larvae lie.
I.B.1d Duplicate
Gauge Removal
The
fourth item is the removal of the temporary USGS gauging facility that is now
located just below the drop structure. There will be no change in the habitat
beyond the removal of of the small wooden man-made structure from a stream that
is to be kept as natural as possible.
I.B.2. Land Habitat: Biological
and Physical Effects on Wildlife and any Significant Aesthetic Effects.
Packwood
Lake proper is in a setting of old growth coniferous forest with variable
topography from alluvial stream bottoms to steep upper slopes. As the drainage
is a component of the Goat Rocks Wilderness area with direct access to the
Cascade Crest trail, timber removal is not part of the management plan.
Therefore the principal impact of uses by man revolve around a variety of
recreational values, largely related to scenery, hiking and fish and game. The patterns
of recreational use are covered in Section I-A of this report and show an
increasing visitation pattern since 1962. No thorough study has been made of
the various reasons people come to the Packwood Lake area, how they get there,
or what they are seeking. Undoubtedly a sizeable number are transient through
the area on the way to or from the Cascade Crest trail in the Goat Rocks
region. However, records available from Mrs. Virginia Hunter, the resort
operator, would indicate that most people visit the lake region for fishing and
camping with some hunting use in the fall.
The
land habitat should then be examined with respect to the proposed action
resulting in any major changes related to principal resource use. An initial
concern was whether high water for short periods at peak flow periods would
have an impact on shoreline vegetation and possible aesthetic aspects of the
lake. A 1964 study of the lake shore and continuous checks since then have
disclosed no modification of the lake shore land habitat which would have a
deleterious effect for
use by man or on land organisms. Lake levels
have been subject to much less fluctuation during the summer period and this
has meant a more aesthetic lake.
Operational
changes requested in the amendment application will not bring about any changes
in land habitat. Reduction of the lake level an additional 1.5 feet during the
winter critical hydro period will expose an additional 1.3 percent of
shoreline. The additional shoreline exposed during the fall and winter seasons
may actually have a favorable impact on elk and deer population by giving these
game animals additional favorable habitats.
II. Adverse
Environmental Effects of Proposed Action and Measures to Avoid or Mitigate Damage.
A. Water
pollution.
The
only change in water quality to be anticipated is a small change in the mixture
of lake outlet water and inflowing spring water in Lake Creek. The inflowing
spring water is cooler in summer and warmer in winter than the lake outlet
water and hence reducing the proportion of lake outlet water should slightly
improve the water temperature for trout and salmon.
B. Air
Pollution Effects. None due
to the proposed action.
C. Public
Health Effects. None due to
the proposed action.
D. Public
Safety Measures
(1) Barriers to ungated
spillways
(2) Alarms and markers
below dams
(3) Reservoir clearing
and debris
(4) Restrictions to use
or zoning
Public safety was a key consideration during the design and
planning of the drop structure located downstream from the Packwood Lake
outlet. There were two primary considerations concerning public safety in the
design of the existing drop structure:
1. Fencing.
The vertical walls on both sides of the drop structure are fenced with cedar
fencing consisting of vertical boards located sufficiently close to prevent
children or larger animals from getting through. The intake structure, adjacent
to the drop structure, is gated with double-locked doors to prevent access. No
change in this feature is contemplated by the amendments.
2. Downstream
Effect of Sudden Discharges. The wide ungated drop structure improves the
protection of fishermen or others who hike into the Lake Creek Gorge. The Lake
Creek Gorge is an extremely precipitous canyon falling approximately 1750 feet
in five miles. Much of this drop is located within a two mile stretch of the
Canyon. Certain areas of the gorge are comprised of a continuous series of
falls and plunge basins with vertical walls which could prevent emergency
escape in
the event
of a sudden uncontrolled discharge from the lake. For this reason, the Licensee
has avoided the use of discharge gates or collapsing flash boards which might
cause uncontrolled discharges resulting from a planned gate or flash board
opening or an accidental discharge resulting from misoperation or vandalism.
The original outlet from Packwood Lake was more or less
"V" shaped and included various obstacles such as logs, debris and
rocks, which caused at times, a damming effect on the lake and was altered from
year-to-year by spring runoff.
The existing drop structure is 85 feet in width and rectangular
in shape. This outlet is not subject to change in characteristics since the
shape is not influenced by obstacles as in the case of any natural outlet.
The unregulated natural flows down the Lake Creek Canyon have
been substantially reduced as a result of Project construction and diversion of
the Packwood Lake discharge. Further, by operating at an elevation less than
the drop structure crest during much of the year, the lake itself is better
able to absorb sudden uncontrolled discharges into the Lake Creek Gorge.
The high flows in the Lake Creek Canyon are limited to periods
when overtopping occurs. During the years 1965 through 1970, the history of
overtopping the drop structure during the spring runoff periods has averaged
6.3 days per year or 1.7 percent on an annual basis. Adoption of the rule curve
should reduce this overtopping and consequently reduce also the risk to people
who might use the lower creek early in the season.
E. On
Fish
No adverse effects are expected. See discussions under
section IB1 above.
F. Wildlife
This Project has been planned with the goal of minimum
environmental changes. The License amendments are requested with the same goal
in mind. There is no evidence in the years of operation of the Project that the
goal has not been achieved. Certainly there is no reason to believe that
changes asked for in the amendment will have any adverse effect on wildlife and
that any measures for correction have to be devised. If anything, the slight
reduction in water level during the winter season may be advantageous to
various forms of wildlife, especially elk.
G. Recreational
Values
Packwood Lake and the surrounding environs is a prime
recreation area involving a variety of users. Ultimate plans for the area must
include adequate facilities for users to enjoy the area without damage to it.
There should also be some attempt at interpretation and instruction with
respect to geology and other natural history.
The original Project development had no adverse recreational
effect on the area and there is no reason to believe the amendment request is
to have any. The additional 1.5 foot lowering of the lake level will occur
during the winter non-use period. It is very likely that the rule curve
reduction in level during the spring runoff season will help to reduce the very
short periods of
high water and could
improve recreational aspects in the early part of the season.
Improved public access into the areas was provided in the
original construction and this should not be changed.
H, I, J. Scenic,
Historic, and Other
Specific areas fitting these categories are not
involved in the Project area or in current considerations. As the amendment
would not change the environment in relationship to any of these values they
are not discussed further.
III. Alternatives
to Proposed Action and Their Environmental Effects.
Alternative Operating Modes
The principal
alternative operating mode would be to continue under the present procedure and
maintain the minimum operating pool level at 2850.5 feet and disallow use of
rule curve during the period of May 1 to June 18.
The
environmental impact of this alternative would relate to higher lake levels for
short periods of time at peak runoff and especially in years of excess snow
pack or excess precipitation. If the high water level was extended up to a
month or six weeks, shoreline vegetation could conceivably suffer depending
upon the length of time and water depth.
Any advantage
to wildlife population from extra shoreline exposure during late fall, winter,
or spring would also be lost by failure to grant the amendment.
IV. Relationship Between Local Short-Term
Environmental Uses and Maintenance and
Enhancement of Long-Term Productivity.
A. Any cumulative adverse effects for future generations to cope with.
The Project has always been planned on the basis of minimum
disturbance to the environment. A natural lake has been used with essentially
the only change being an eight foot reduction of lake level fluctuation during
the winter non-recreational use period. The adoption of a spring rule curve, as
per the Licensee's specific request, will not have any adverse effect for
future generations in this plan. However, the increased recreational use of the
area from 918 registered visitors before the Project operation to 2500 in 1970
does give some cause for concern. Facilities, including campgrounds, and trails
were inadequate in 1964 and no general improvement has been made by the U. S.
Forest Service since that time, except to require permanent access improvement
by road and trail construction from the Cowlitz Valley to the lake. A specific
attempt should be made to inventory all recreational resources of the Packwood
Lake area, prepare a comprehensive plan which would provide for all users
including protection of the recreational resource, and then finance needed
developments. Evidence now exists that unless something is done soon, overuse
and misuse of critical areas can lead to adverse effects which could damage
this unique recreational area for many years.
B. Comparative effects in short- and long-term from various alternatives.
Operation of the Project drop structure has fairly stabilized
the lake's summer elevation and decreased shore erosion. During the first six
years of Project operation, the operating pool has been accurately maintained
during the recreation period May 1 through September 15. However, the
requirement that the Licensee have a full pool elevation by May 1 of each year,
proves a hardship on recreation and shoreline since the full pool elevation on
May 1 results in little or no control over sudden occurrences of heavy runoff
during periods of heavy snow pack.
Through adoption of a rule curve, the spring lake level can be
further stabilized on an annual basis to provide for maximum seasonal runoffs,
and thereby minimize the adverse environmental impact on the shoreline.
Alternatives to this are to continue the operating level at 2857
feet ± 0.5 feet rather than between 2854 and 2855 feet, as recommended by the
Licensee; and suffer excessive runoffs during the late spring which over a
period of years may adversely affect the shoreline and the economic potential
of the Project.
V. Any
Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitments of Resources in Approval of Proposed Action.
The four items in the proposal primarily request changes in the
operational procedures required by the License. None of these procedural
changes will cause any irreversible changes in the environment and, of course,
they are not permanent commitments.
In addition to the procedural changes, it is proposed to
construct some pools in lower Lake Creek. These will be constructed entirely of
rubble and gravel with no concrete. They could be removed by a bulldozer more
easily than they can be built.
Neither the procedural changes nor the structures will restrict
the possible range of beneficial uses of this environment.
EXHIBIT 1
EXHIBIT NO. 1
FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION
WASHINGTON 20426
PWR-LP
Project
No. 2244-Washington
Washington
Public Power
Supply
System
Mr. Owen W. Hurd, Managing Director
Washington Public Power Supply System
P. O. Box 6510
C O P Y
Kennewick, Washington, 99336
Dear Mr. Hurd:
On June 13,
1969 Mr. S. K. Billingsley of your staff participated in a meeting at the FPC
office in Washington attended by Mr. John Adams of the Forest Service, Mr. M.
Frank Thomas and other representatives of the Commission staff. The meeting was
held to discuss the present status of the Memorandum of Agreement on operating
standards and other measures for the maintenance of Lake Creek flows from your
Packwood Lake Project No. 2244 and other matters pertaining to that project. At
that meeting the participants reviewed a letter from the U. S. Forest Service
to the Commission, dated June 12, 1969, pertaining to the project. A copy of
this letter is enclosed for your information.
While the
Memorandum of Agreement prescribes discharges into Lake Creek, there are a
number of other matters as yet not fully agreed upon. These include the minimum
permissible operating level of the lake, normal maximum pool level, maximum
permissible pool level and duration thereof, operating range during the
recreation season, the period of the normal recreation season and the practical
recreation period with snow conditions which would have the potential of
precipitating a flood at Packwood Lake project, and the location, type and
responsibility for discharge measurement devices. A number of factors regarding
these matters were discussed at the meeting on June 13th.
While the
present Article 39 of the license must be amended to authorize the lower
minimum discharge contained in the Memorandum of Agreement, it is desirable
that all other appropriate points should be considered and incorporated into
the license at one time. Accordingly it
is not proposed to recommend amendment of Article 39 of the license until other
appropriate changes have been submitted for consideration.
Mr.
Owen W. Hurd - 2 -
As discussed at the meeting, it is requested
that the Washington Public Power Supply System prepare proposals for the
resolution of remaining problems, and submit these proposals with appropriate
justification to the various interested agencies. After allowing reasonable
time for review of the proposals and any clarification deemed necessary, a
meeting will be held in Washington, D. C. for the purpose of finalizing
proposals to be submitted to the Commission for consideration. It is suggested
that the submission of proposals be not later than August 1, 1969 which would
permit a meeting in September. Your recommendations for a time table would be
welcomed.
The Washington Public Power Supply System
may wish to proceed with the construction of the stream improvements at the
junction of Lake Creek and the Cowlitz River as outlined in the Memorandum of
Agreement. As we understand it, these improvements are outside the project
boundaries.
Very truly yours,
Enclosure
No. 53919
Ltr from USFS dtd 6/12/69
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT II
Tabulation of Visitor Facilities
at Packwood Lake
Roads and Trails
Three
miles of scenic access roads, four miles of trail to Packwood Lake were
constructed by the Licensee and are maintained for free use by the general
public.
Boat and Fishing Dock
One
boat dock is maintained for free public use by the concessionaire.
Boat Ramps
No
boat ramp is appropriate since vehicular access is unavailable to the lake.
Bathing Areas
Areas
are available for swimming but use is limited due to the 40-65 degree lake
water temperature.
Marinas
The
Packwood Lake concessionaire rents approximately 30 boats for fishing use. No
motors on Packwood Lake are allowed.
Hiking and Riding Trails
In
addition to the four mile access trail to the lake, Forest Service trails
continue beyond Packwood Lake; one to Fish Lake north of Packwood Lake and a
trail connecting with the Cascade Crest trail. Motorized vehicles are not
allowed on trails beyond Packwood Lake.
Picnic and Camping Areas
Two
campgrounds are located on the north side of Packwood Lake comprising space for
approximately 20 tent sites and approximately 20 tables. Water and sanitary
facilities are provided by the U. S. Forest Service.
Cabin
The
Packwood Lake Resort rents eight cabins for overnight visitors not using the
campgrounds.
- 2 –
Fishing Supplies
Bait
and fishing tackle is available at retail prices from the Resort operator.
Meals
Breakfast,
lunch and dinner can be purchased at the concession through prior arrangement.
Trailer Spaces
The
Licensee constructed parking lot includes sufficient space for approximately 10
camping trailers in addition to parking space for 30 cars.
Powerhouse Tours
Tours
of the Project powerhouse are offered during working hours, Monday through
Friday.
Fees
No
fees are charged for use of Project or Forest Service facilities. User-fees are
applied only to row boats, food and supplies, meals and overnight lodging.
EXHIBIT 3
EXHIBIT 3

PACKWOOD LAKE RESORT
Packwood, Washington
September 22, 1970
S.
K. Billingsley, Project Manager
Washington Public Power Supply System
P.O. Box 6510
130 Vista Way,
Kennewick, Washington 99336
Dear
Mr. Billingsley:
In
answer to your letter of August 31, 1970, please let me apologize first for
being so long in answering. I was somewhat concerned about the effect the lower
lake levels might have on my facilities at Packwood Lake Resort and consequent
results to the early spring business. However, subsequent conversations with
you and with Mr. Bob Sandusky have further explained your proposal and
convinced me that this would not adversely affect my activities.
I
realize what a tremendous problem it is to cope with the fluctuating snow loads
and wide weather variance that occurs in that area. I feel you have done a
magnificent job of controlling the lake level during these early spring run-off
months. I am aware of the constant surveillance you give to this situation.
Our
season begins with the opening of fishing season--lowland lake--which is the
middle of April. Normally, the snow is very nearly gone at that time and we
have a full complement of hardy fishermen for opening day, despite the fact
that they may be fishing in snow flurries. In 1969 the snow load was such that
we could not open at all until mid-May.
Each
year shows a significant increase in the use of the facilities, both at Packwood
Lake Resort and at the public campgrounds on the lake shore. There is a
definite increase in public interest in hiking, camping, and fishing, and
Packwood Lake is an outstandingly beautiful area, completely unique in its
isolation and available facilities. However, through the increased use, it is
becoming apparent that the campgrounds are not adequate. The trails are more
often than not blocked for long periods, it is a fine area for horse packing
and there are absolutely no facilities for horses in the camping areas. The
resort is badly in need of updating, cabins and main lodge. However, in view of
the fact that, so far, I have not been able to obtain more than a yearly permit
type of license for operating the resort, I don't feel I can invest the money
it would take to make the improvements needed.
Let
me take this opportunity to thank WPPSS for the fine and ever present
cooperation I have had during my four seasons of operation. Everyone has shown
personal interest and thoughtfulness. I am happy to cooperate to the fullest
with your proposal for an adjustment to your present lake level requirements.

Virginia
L. Hunter
Owner-Operator,
Packwood
Lake Resort
4821
Kent-DesMoines Road
Kent,
Washington 98031
UL
2-0135
EXHIBIT 4
![]()
UNITED
STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
FOREST
SERVICE
GIFFORD
PINCHOT NATIONAL FOREST
500 W. 12TH
ST. (P.O. BOX 449)
VANCOUVER.
WASHINGTON 98660 IN REPLY REFER TO
2750
June 24,
1968
Mr.
Owen D. Hurd, Managing Director
Washington
Public Power Supply System
P.O.
Box 6510
Kennewick,
Washington 99336
Dear Mr. Hurd:
Attached is a copy of the
Memorandum of Agreement pertaining to flows in Lake Creek and signed by all
parties concerned. The original has been forwarded to the Regional Forester.
The Agreement will ultimately be forwarded to the Federal Power Commission
through our Washington office. We will keep you advised of developments.
Sincerely yours,
ROSS WILLIAMS
Forest Supervisor

Enclosure

MEMORANDUM
OF AGREEMENT
Packwood
Lake Project
Article 39 FPC License No. 2244
November
2, 1967
This Memorandum of
Agreement results from a meeting of parties interested in fishwater releases
and improvements on Lake Creek, Packwood Lake Hydro-electric Project, Federal
Power Commission Project No. 2244, held at Packwood, Washington on September
25, 1967. At this meeting the parties reviewed the conditions at Lake Creek
under various flows of releases from Packwood Lake.
The parties mutually agree
on certain operating standards and other measures for the maintenance of Lake
Creek flows.
To accomplish the
provisions of Article 39 of FPC License 2244 and to set standards for the
future operation of the Project, the parties mutually agree as follows:
1. During the entire year the licensee will
release a minimum of 3 cfs from Packwood Lake to Lake Creek. During the period
from May 15 to September 15 each year the licensee will release up to a maximum
of 5 cfs in order to facilitate a flow of 15 cfs at the gaging station
identified as "Lake Creek at Mouth."
2. The licensee shall install and annually
maintain stream improvement near the mouth of Lake Creek. This stream
improvement is illustrated by Attachment No. 1. The location of the improvement
is just above its junction with the unnamed slough that connects with the Cowlitz
River.
3. In June of each year, the stream improvement
will be inspected by the licensee and the Washington Department of Fisheries to
determine what repair, if any, is required to maintain the improvement. If
repair is required, construction will be accomplished by WPPSS. Washington
Department of Fisheries will arrange with property owners for access to the
work.
4. WPPSS will maintain the entrance of the
unnamed slough which joins the Cowlitz River with Lake Creek so that the
combined flow of the slough in Lake Creek approximates 25 cfs below the
confluence of Lake Creek and the unnamed slough. In the event that the Cowlitz
River floods cause a major change in the topography of the confluence, the
interested agencies will meet and agree upon a modification to these
construction requirements for stream improvement.


